The Simpletons Speak Out - Oh Dear, Kent Too, Why Would That Be?

Friday, August 31, 2012

Sex offenders register [sic] branded “wholly inadequate” after Dover paedophile [sic] goes missing

"Serious questions have been raised over the effectiveness of the sex offenders register [sic] after a convicted paedophile [sic] who abused a young boy was able to slip off the radar [sic]."

"Gravesend-based Family Matters [keeerchhhingnngg], the UK’s largest [?], specialist counselling service for survivors of sexual abuse and rape, said the sex offenders register [sic] was a “false hope” in keeping children safe.

Operations director at the charity Malcolm Gilbert said: “It is a wholly inadequate instrument for protecting our children –its minimal restrictions [sic] are routinely flouted and disregarded by many hundreds of offenders.

“The police make no active effort to check those registered in their area [sic]. It is a waste of time [sic] and leads to an impression of false security [correct].

“If we think these people are a threat [risk is relative, what is your risk, Malcolm?] then the actions we take should proportionate to the threat [we agree, stop registration]. The whole matter should be reviewed and alternatives sought [any ideas, Malcolm?].”

He said the register was more of a “gesture” than an action [sic] as there are no requirements other than registering an address with police [hahahahaha].

“If they were required to sign on daily to police as is done with certain bail conditions then that would be something,” he added." [is that it? Is that the kingpin of your final solution, Malcolm? They do, when they are required to, you uninformed fool]