Sunday, 27 April 2014

It Would Be Hilarious, If It Were Not So Sad And Worrying

Sunday 27 April 2014 01.41 BST

Paedophiles [not] to be treated as terrorists [well, that's a promotion then !!!] under new crackdown

"PM moves to close loophole [sic] that allows sexual predators [sic] to produce and possess 'manuals' [sic] to help them [sic] commit crimes

David Cameron said: 'I want to ensure we do everything we can to protect children.' [hahahaha - you tool]

Paedophiles [not] will be handed the same treatment as terrorists [employed by MI5/6?] under a crackdown on child abuse [sic] to be included in the Queen's speech.

David Cameron said he wanted to close a loophole [sic] that allows sexual predators to produce and possess "manuals" giving tips on how to identify victims, groom them, and evade capture [sic].

In future, they will face the same kind of sanctions as extremists who download guides to bomb-making [because, that is so effective, against actual terrorism].

The issue came to light after GCHQ and the National Crime Agency found online examples of the guides in the chaotic [?] part of cyberspace known as the "dark web""

12:56am UK, Sunday 27 April 2014

PM: Paedophiles [not] Will Be Treated Like Terrorists

Published: 27 April 2014

Paedophiles [not] to be treated as terrorists

27 April 2014 Last updated at 04:51

Downloading child abuse 'manuals' to be made illegal


28 April 2014

The war on paedos: grooming the public’s fears

"The interweaving of the narrative of terrorism with that of paedophilia is driven by a tendency to attach campaigns and causes to the cause of child protection. Since its inception in September 2001, the war on terror has always been far too distant and abstract to capture the imagination of the British and European public. However, perceptions about the threat of stranger-danger to children are very different. Paedophilia has emerged as an all-purpose focus of dread, which is why policymakers tend to interpret threats through the idiom of child protection.

There are many reasons why Western governments have proved so inept at containing the appeal of radical jihadist movements. The tendency to infantilise potential terrorist recruits and to treat their inculcation as akin to being groomed by a paedophile indicates that at least some counter-terrorist officials have become lost in their own fantasy world. It is likely that this war on paedophilia will be just as pointless and ineffective as the one waged against Islamist groomers. Common sense looks likely to be the main casualty of this war, and the professional demonologist its main beneficiary."


Sunday, 4 May, 2014

Paedophiles to be treated like terrorists

"Even somewhat overbroad legislation against “how to” manuals ought not to impact Heretic TOC legally, as this blog definitely does not incite law-breaking. Indirectly, though, it would have a very chilling effect. What worries me far more is the potential for yet another measure, because they never stop coming, do they? And what would it look like, this further laceration in our slow death by a thousand cuts? Now that we are to be firmly yoked together with terrorism it’s obvious, isn’t it?

Glorifying terrorism was made illegal by the Terrorism Act 2006. So logically the next step would be to ban the glorification of paedophilia – a “crime” that could well be framed to include saying anything whatever in its favour. This could spell trouble for Heretic TOC, and possibly for any advocacy aimed at lowering the age of consent, even by only a year. Now, that would really be a scary prospect for democracy."

Tuesday, 15 April 2014

Knowing The Foibles Of Humanity


Today's Untouchables: Sex Offenders

"Sex offenders are the foremost pariahs of our current day. In opinion polls, even intravenous drug users place higher.

A recent series of high profile cases involving child sexual abuse have revealed the maddening frequency of the problem.

My hometown newspaper now exists in electronic format, and as I read the local news, it seems that every other week brings a report of a new crime against minors.

This is only the tip of the iceberg.

Most are the product of incest, unreported, hushed up within families. The offenses that occur in a public setting, among those who aren't blood relatives, most often make it to most peoples' attention ..."


Tuesday, April 15, 2014

CA - Do Ex-Sex Offenders Have Civil Rights?

"They are the most loathed convicts on the planet. Even other criminals hate them. Cities in recent years have targeted them with laws that limit where and when they can be certain places, particularly on Halloween, when children are out.

But ex-sex offenders do have rights. At least that's the contention of a group called California Reform Sex Offender Laws."

Of Course, There Was No 'Abuser' - Just A False Construct, To Maintain The Pain And The Kudos

For the record. We will not crop it, as the contexts will be lost ...


April 14, 2014 

How I feel about the abuser

"I got followed on Twitter by a registered sex offender over the weekend, and when I found out, I was just like 'meh'.

"Yeah, I was just like that.

I know I was supposed to get all angry and upset about it, and demand that Twitter ban his account (which I hope they do); I know it was designed to ruin my day and my mood, but it didn't. I think it's 'cause I can see it all for what it really is. And it got me thinking about how I feel about my father today.

The thing is, I strongly believe in the 'spiritual' maxim: 'happy people don't do bad things.' This makes perfect sense to me. My ugliest behaviour has always come from a place of pain, and when I'm happy, I want others to share in my happiness too. The world looks so different when I'm happy, from when I'm sad. And long story short, abusers ain't happy.

Ok let me elaborate a little. I don't think you can be happy whilst simultaneously destroying other people's happiness. At best, you'll be avoiding your own pain i.e. if you screw over your rival to get ahead in the big game of life, sure, there will be the absence of pain, because for a short time you won't feel inferior to them, you can experience some peace for a short while... I'm not convinced that it's happiness, though.

In life, we are all suffering, and the way we treat other people reflects the extent of our suffering. Now this guy on Twitter has been galavanting around the cyber space pretending that he's oh so nonchalant about everyone's unbridled hatred towards him, but I don't buy it. Even if in his own mind, as a lot of child abusers do, he thinks he's somehow 'right' about his previous actions, feeling ostracised by society has gotta suck. You can't just shake that off. You think he doesn't know, deep down, that he's an idiot? He knows. And if he don't consciously know, well, the signs of subconscious knowing are there for all to see: every Tweet oozing with frustration at the world, so much time and energy put into trying to score petty points against others - it's a sad life. It's one I almost pity.

Actually, I do pity him. There, I said it. I pity him and anyone else who's ever fallen so low that they've abused a child/delighted in the occurrence of their abuse, and then gone on to try and justify it. I know that the initial, understandable, relatable, damn well straight response to an abuser is utter contempt, and that's how it ought to be. But me, I'm tired of giving 'em enough airtime, it just goes round and round, some folks are incapable of reason because if they accepted reason then they would also have to face what they are. Nope, too painful. But you can be sure that no matter what tomfoolery he or they come out with next, they are suffering immensely. Possibly even more than you or I. Well, definitely more than me, I'm having a hoot.

You see, I might have been a victim of the abuser's messed up beliefs, and it very much had a negative impact on my life to have to deal with it all, but I'm out of it now. I get to go on and do normal things like build friendships and follow interests and, oh yeah, be accepted by society. It's done. For me, it's over. But for Bill the pain is unending. It'll never be over for the abuser, particularly not when they refuse to admit remorse - or fail to feel it altogether.

I used to spend a lot of time agonising over whether Dad really acknowledged what he'd done, deep down in the recesses of his - chest area. It was so important to me that he was capable of remorse, and when no evidence of it showed up, I chose to believe in it anyway, a bit like God. I told myself that, deep down, he knew what he'd done, he was just too cowardly to admit it. Now I realise that he probably genuinely doesn't think he's done anything wrong. And in a way, that's even more dire for him. He is actually incapable of remorse. What a sorry, pitiful, degenerate kind of existence that must be.

I think survivors often envision their abusers as 'winning' somehow, as 'getting away with it', as if they get to walk off into the sunset laughing. I don't think this is accurate. Of course, if you've ever had to endure contact with your abuser after disclosure, then they will try to enforce that image to cause you pain in order to try and relieve some of their own. It becomes an adversarial battle about winning and losing and even point scoring. But what we don't realise is, we win by default because we don't abuse kids!!! There's nothing to prove, nothing to fight for, nothing to analyse. To abuse a child in all their innocence, you gotta be pretty messed up. You're already so, so, so lost by the time you start abusing them. Even if you're rich and reputable, in your head you must be suffering immensely. And basically, serves you right son.

Karma doesn't have to be a linear narrative of 'do this bad thing, THEN a bad thing will happen to you' - rather, it's a simultaneous transaction: 'for you to even DO that bad thing, you must already be in such pain.'

And so, your abuser can never 'win'. They're not putting their feet up after a hard day's molesting, to listen to some Sinatra and feel good about themselves. That doesn't happen. Rather, they will derive whatever cruel semblence of actual happiness that they can, desperate, like a starving rat nibbling through the trash. It's not a dignified life. And it's simply your bad luck that you came into contact with such a dysfunctional individual when you were young and vulnerable. It's nothing you did. You didn't make them that way.

Nowadays I feel more or less indifferent to the abuser because I'm too busy focusing on me. Sure, if I bother to really think about those memories, of course I'll get upset and angry and want to shoot him. But that's exactly it... why bother? I don't define myself by what happened to me. I partially define myself by what I'm doing about it. And you can't say I'm repressed, because I've done all the letter-writing and contemplating and pillow-punching so that the anger I feel doesn't show up in my day-to-day life. There's only so many times you can keep squeezing the sponge of your past to get all the pain out; after that, it's just not interesting anymore. For the most part you can leave it where it is and focus on the here and now.

Never believe it when an abuser or other cray-cray tries to make out like they're laughing at you, mocking you, getting the better of you, and goin' home for that Sinatra. It ain't happening. It's an illusion designed to hurt you 'cause they still haven't learned that you can't be happy whilst hurting another individual; though you can be entertained, and it's a distraction from the inner void of self-loathing that they all experience without exception. That's why they're doing it. They're 'thriving' on the fuss, the controversy, the supposed power trip; but remember, you, the survivor, won and win and keep on winning by default. Why?

Because you don't abuse kids! There can be no greater slam-dunk than that. Go live your life and give 'em the two-finger salute, it's the best way of exposing how powerless they really are."!How-I-feel-about-the-abuser/c21su/6D0B66AC-454E-4955-BCEB-3EFA47AC2E11


Siobhan Pyburn @siobhanpyburn

1:59pm Tuesday 23rd February 201

Life after abuse

17 Oct 2013

Attorney General aims to put sex abuse victims first


April 19, 2014

Changing the meaning of the abuse

"I wrote in my last post about the sex offender who followed me on Twitter; well, on his site, he's got a reading list of things what conveniently make his previous actions sound okay. Yeah, I know. From there I discovered that there are some authors who go so far as to say that the pain from sexual abuse specifically is a myth and it isn't the abuse itself which damages us, but our narrative of it - the way society deals with it, and paints it, and makes it out to be this big bad thing which it's not.

Well, to that I say an almighty fuck off. How can anyone say that sexual abuse isn't a damaging experience? [inconsistent evidence] Of course it is. But. But. The general principle of 'things have no meaning but for the meaning you give it' applies to a sexually abusive past as much as it does anything else. As a kid you had no choice in what happened or how you perceived it; but as an adult, the power is in our hands. We have the power of decision at our disposal, any second that we wanna use it.

One day I just decided that I wanted to take responsibility for who I was gonna be from now on, and re-framed the abuse accordingly. I'll never say it wasn't a big deal. It was huge. But it is done now. Sometimes there are after-effects and I totally anticipate that and will deal with them as and when they occur.

But I'm not gonna let that dirty old man (read: terribly tormented, suffering sould, as discussed is previous post) [well really !!!] ruin my life and that's the bottom line. [you fabricated the construct]."!Changing-the-meaning-of-the-abuse/c21su/24F1AE54-8485-4B6F-8CAB-2CC322D96459

Monday, 14 April 2014

OK Ian - You Have Skype?


Or ... I can set-up a conferencing site, for all to watch?

We can have the debate, you seem to be trying to avoid.


Addendum (15/4/14; 1:35 am)

As I have told you, twice already, I have no problem meeting you, in person - can you give me a good reason why, because I can see, not one?

I normally require travel expenses and the cost of a meal, but, in this case, I will waive that.

As I suggest, it is 2014 and Skype et al are available, but, if you must see me, in the flesh, then let me know why, and we may make suitable arrangements; remember, half-way.

Nigel @The OSC

Sunday, 13 April 2014


Published online: 25 Mar 2014

Trends of indecent images of children and child sexual offences between 2005/2006 and 2012/2013 within the United Kingdom

Michelle Ann McManus & Louise Almond

"Little is known about the trends of indecent images of children (IIOC) offences, as UK criminal justice figures are unavailable within official crime data.

This study aims to explore the rates of conviction and the relationship between IIOC offences and child sexual abuse offences from 2005/2006 to 2012/2013.

The results indicated a continuing increase in offences of take, permit, distribute IIOC, rape of a child under 13, sexual activity of child under 16 and abuse of children through prostitution or pornography.

Six out of a possible 17 correlations were significant, with the strongest correlation found between take, make, distribute IIOC and rape of a female under 13.

Explanations for the findings are discussed and the utility of comprehensive prevalence figures for different stakeholders involved in addressing this crime issue."


The results of this paper found that IIOC offences have been increasing between 2005/2006 and 2012/2013 for the IIOC offence of take, make, distribute, but not for possession of IIOC. In addition, there was a continued increase for child sexual offences of rape of a child under 13, all child sexual activity and abuse of a child through prostitution or pornography, with other child sexual offences indicating a fluctuating pattern across the 8-year time period.

When exploring the relationship between IIOC offences and child sexual abuse, significant positive relationships were found for the offence of take, make and distribute IIOC with child sexual abuse offences of rape of a child under 13 (for both males and females), all child sexual activity, particularly sexual activity with a child under 16, and abuse of a child through prostitution or pornography. All other comparisons were non-significant.

Potential explanations for these finding could be attributed in two key ways: first, due to the increased awareness and reporting of IIOC and child sexual abuse offences, along with increased success of child protection and law enforcement agencies. The development of specialist collaborative agencies such as Child Exploitation Online Centre, Virtual Global Task Force and most recently the European Cybercrime Centre have no doubt contributed to public awareness and increased detection of these offenders (CEOP, 2012).

Alternatively, these findings could be due to an increase in people actually engaging in these particular offences. Although a causal relationship cannot be inferred, whilst IIOC offences of take, make and distribute IIOC offences have increased, so have certain child sexual abuse offences. Further work is required to understand this relationship and whether the increase in IIOC has resulted in more child sexual abuse offences, or vice versa. These results are informative to law enforcement agencies and key stakeholders involved in criminal justice and child protection."

 (Embedded Tweets - click date)


More to follow.

What If The Cost Of Free Speech Turns Out To Be More Lives?

Sunday, April 13, 2014

When is free speech not free?

"We know we can't yell fire in a crowded theater. Or incite to riot. Or threaten the president.

What about gloating on air at the death of someone we don't even know because he is a registered sex offender? What about encouraging hate-mongering and violence against people who have paid their debts to society and have integrated into society as law-abiding citizens?

Comments posted on articles about the murders of or attacks on those on the registry make it clear that there is an element out there willing to encourage and praise such illegal vigilante activity, up to and including murder.

But from recognized radio personalities? ..."


Cognitive Distortions

So easy (not very clued-up, on @-priority, either).


Oh dear, Mr McF ... 

Sometimes, good judgment(alism), is essential.

Get ready for it ...

P-A kicks in, after the damage is done - oh dear - this can only end in tears.

I Have Always Found That Mercy Bears Richer Fruits Than Strict Justice

Are Memories So Painfully Short? 


April 12, 2014 

Not to be confused: Vigilant & Vigilantes

 "One area that never ceases to amaze is that of public opinion. As an active voice for people with convictions, I was dumbstruck earlier this week when a tweet appeared on my timeline from a person I have never engaged with previously. The tweet was “informing” me of the online presence of a certain individual. Now, I am not one to encroach on other people’s opinions, and like the proverbial rectum, we all have one and some are larger than others.

My ongoing research, digging into the CJS brings some unpleasant truths. There are crimes against children which are heinous, of this there is no doubt. I am a mother, I am a daughter and despite my fractured family circumstances, my emotional involvement with my family remains. A crime against a child can, and is never, condoned by me. As the modern gift of technology gives the public a voice, I enjoy the vehicles we have in order to voice our opinions, be those good, challenging or diametrically opposed. I am of the mind that being given the opportunity to re-think a matter is not a bad idea. It is a constant learning curve as I look into the dungeons of the CJS.

As the buzz of my phone told me there was a tweet to my account, I do look and I do read. The tweet, although inoffensive, was a polite tweet asking me if I knew who I was conversing with. I responded I was fully aware of whom I was conversing with. I added in the same question back to the person, in asking him if he knew he was conversing with a convicted fraudster. The account stated he didn’t. But that there was a huge difference between fraud and offences of a sexual nature against children. I am impartial on this one. I don’t condone any offence against a child sexual or otherwise. I also do not condone my own offences of fraud.

What then transpired was a clear attempt to rid Twitter of this individual. Every single follower of this account had the same tweet and those who defended their right to make their own choices were then accused of supporting child abuse, covering up child abuse and a string of profane tweets between a group of individuals who have posted the location of the account concerned and listed the individual on a website that screams “vigilantes”. I was told my position “incensed” other people in that they were confused over my stance on those with convictions. Coupled with the profane tweets from “supporters” I made use of the block button fairly quickly. I do not feel harassed nor do I feel victimised by this unsavoury event. But there are some people one just cannot reason with.

Looking back and a further discussion with a friend, who received a separate attack due to her opinions on those who are falsely accused (proven in court by the way) of sexual offences and not necessarily against children, I am amazed not at this vigilante attack but at the insulting manner in which many people’s chosen followers were questioned. Twitter is full of the human race, tweeting regularly on media matters, personal matters and a whole diverse range of subject matter from A-Z. Removing my opinion on vigilantism from the following, I felt one thing and only one thing. The moment a person questions who I follow is the moment a red flag appears and an attempt to control not only me, but many others who rightly so, follow and converse with whom they please. That is our right as human beings, it is not a right for others to question because that choice does not sit with their moral outrage at events.

Challenge my opinions by all means, challenge what I put out there, I am not adverse to discussion and debate about where I stand. But under no circumstances, attempt to clean up my choice over whom I follow and converse with. That smacks of control and an attempt to overrule people’s right of choice. It is unacceptable and punitive behaviour.

There is a world of difference between being vigilant with our online presence, the footprint we leave behind and vigilantism. I respect people’s choice to follow, unfollow or block whom they like and it is not my right to question their decision and nor would I ever want to insult their intelligence with such behaviour. Vigilantism is not an “ism” I am comfortable with and nor will I subscribe. I find the recent events of a cultish nature and we all know what a cult is. It is when there is not enough people to form a minority."

Saturday, 12 April 2014

How We Love Them - Publicity And Potential, Money Cannot Buy

Petition published by chris wittwer on Jun 20, 2012

Of course, Chris was the biggest Petition Tool.

Now a new breed emerges, fresh from LaLa Land ...

Here is a later draft ...

(Embedded Tweet - click date)


No, No, No - you plonkers ... you must DEMAND !!! it happens.

Nationwide? - pah ... worldwide, if you please.




Ban Paedophiles & Sex Offenders From Internet Access 

"Petition by michael taylor, London, United Kingdom

Petitioning Protect Our Children

Ban Paedophiles & Sex Offenders From Internet Access

Offenders who have been tried and convicted of paedophile charges, including sex offenders who downloaded, supplied and viewed indecent child images, should be banned from having an internet connection and / or mobile device capable of communicating using mobile internet services.

The ban should be a life time ban reducing the risk of sex offenders pursuing victims and / or running paedophile related sites in which these offenders often converse.

The ban should be extended to use of internet facilities provided by private and public organisations such as libraries and internet cafes.

This petition has been set up in regard to such a paedophile support site called OSC (On-line Sex Offender Community) which provides support and advice to Sex Offenders & Paedophiles often providing links to sites which are aimed at Children."

Right folks, you know you wanna, correct names and locations, if you please ...

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

Still no email, with contact details.

(Embedded Tweets - click date)  


As per, we will put them right, on a few things, in the future.


On Twitter - Trolling, Hating, False-Flagging, Spamming And The Response To Them


I do love to piss off a registered sex offender . Then they blog about me !
— Ian Mcfadyen (@IanMcFadyen1966) April 9, 2014

(Embedded Tweet - click date


As an opener, we should like to refer readers, to our comment, in January 2014 ...

"We expect, Bruce will have his minions and lawyers, scurrying around, doing his best to get the OSC removed from Twitter - he is, after all, a Sales Director. They are a private company, that is their choice, within the law. We understand this - profit is all, to these people.

We find Twitter useful, but, would find it just as useful, without an account."

The Ignorant And Dangerous Unite, Again (2) - That Pesky Report Button - The Irony


Published: 19:23, 12 May 2014 | Updated: 19:24, 12 May 2014

Fed up with your friend's annoying updates? Twitter launches mute button to temporarily silence annoying tweeters

">Muting a user on means their Tweets and Retweets will no longer be visible

>Users also no longer receive push or SMS notifications from that user

>Muted user will not know that you’ve muted them"


More to follow, just confirming a few things.

Pursuing? - When Survivors Attack - 6


Sick Britain @SickBritain1

Featured Posted on April 12, 2014

The UK IS a Paedophile Run Country and Parliament Is It’s HQ 

"I am currently pursuing [stalking, harassing?] a convicted sex offender who was [ah] in procession [sic] of indecent child images and who was allowed to pursue his sick [sic] minded perversions from his jail cell [sic]. Now released he continues to do the same behind the mask [sic] of an organisation called OSC ( ...

Due to the lack of police interest [oh, quite the opposite], I am making it my quest to take this to the press, if no one else will do it or assist, I will! I own plenty of TV Camera Equipment and have my own edit facility which I am willing to use. watch this space!"

Sick indeed.

(Embedded Tweet - click date)


Therein, lies the fundamental problem, for these people.

Little knowledge of the law (particularly what registering, under the SOA 2003, is all about), operational processes and how many things happen, quietly and correctly, behind the scene ... often, little knowledge of anything of relevance; sometimes, just plain nasty and dangerous.

We try to teach them, but, they often have to learn the lesson, in a bitter way. 


Posted on April 12, 2014  

What / Who is the OSC (Online Sex Offenders Community) [what is a question mark?]

"Twitter have recently banned [sic] his @OSCP1 account and have actively closed down the following 10 accounts he tried setting up within 24 hrs [false-flagged 'spam' protection - yawn].

We have evidence of him intimidating victims of child abuse [good enough for court, we hope, for your sake] and sharing sites of interest to paedophiles using twitter. [Oh Noes !!!]

He always refers to himself as “We / They / Us” when in fact the OSC is no more than him probably [?] sat on a sofa with a laptop conversing secretly [?] with child abusing / paedophile members. He continuously refers to libel [never], being harassed [correct] when in fact, it is him pursuing victims and preying on child support organisations. [good enough for court, we hope] "


You have our email, above.

Your full, correct, name ... and then we can party ... oh, and make sure you keep up with this thread ....

Ladies And Gentlemen - Please Meet, Mr Mic Wright (Part 3)


Posted on April 13, 2014 

Love Is Love, Love Knows No Age, No Distance, No Gender 

"You Nigel are the lowest [!] form of life, despite your academic qualifications, you have no real [?] humanity, you are an abuser [?], a sex offender, in fact an unrepentant sex offender of the worst kind [!].

You are a danger to all children [?]. Love, you wouldn’t know what it was if your life depended on it. [!]"

You have a son? - oh dear.

Still no email. 


All-righty-then, being as it is in red, and all ;)

 ... bless 'his' lack of knowledge, logic and understanding (a bit of libel in there too :( ) :)

Friday, 11 April 2014

Irish - We Are Saying Nothing


Well, Of Course - Always Nice To Have More Evidence, Though

The endorsement of cognitive distortions: comparing child pornography offenders and contact sex offenders

"Psychology, Crime & Law

DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.902454

Hannah L. Merdiana, Cate Curtisa, Jo Thakkera, Nick Wilsonb & Douglas P. Boera

Received: 20 Aug 2012
Accepted: 28 Feb 2014
Published online: 07 Apr 2014


"This study examined the endorsement of cognitive distortions in child pornography offenders (CPOs), using an established assessment tool, the Abel and Becker Cognition Scale. The scale was expanded to include cognitions specific to child pornography offending, extracted from Howitt and Sheldon's Children and Sexual Activities Inventory (C&SA).

Three samples of CPOs, child sex offenders and offenders with both offence types responded to the cognition items.

An exploratory Principal Component Analysis suggested six main components of the scale. CPOs were significantly less likely to endorse these statements in general, and this was more pronounced on items that project blame onto the child or other people, describe a need for power and consider children as sexually active.

The statements extracted from C&SA did not differentiate between the groups.

These findings are discussed under consideration of the relationship between cognitive distortions and contact sex offending, and in reference to the general criticism concerning the definition and appropriate measurement of cognitive distortions." 

 (Embedded Tweets - click date)

Birds Of A Feather

(Embedded Tweets - click date)


2:20pm UK, Friday 11 April 2014

Sarah Payne's Mother Praises Rebekah Brooks

"The former News Of The World editor was "really sweet natured" and had "a certain directness about her", jurors are told.

Rebekah Brooks and Sara Payne, mother of murdered child Sarah Payne

Rebekah Brooks and Sarah Payne in 2011

Sara Payne, whose daughter Sarah was murdered in 2000, has praised ex-newspaper editor Rebekah Brooks and said the News Of The World had been a "force for good".

Mrs Payne gave her support to Brooks and retired managing director Stuart Kuttner as a witness at the phone hacking trial at the Old Bailey, saying the pair had provided personal support during the search for her daughter and the Sarah's Law campaign.

"It's easy to forget in these dark times the NOTW has often been a force for good and it has something to do with the people who worked on it," Mrs Payne said.

"I do not pretend they are perfect or always got things right ...""

Really?  Services Rendered.



Addendum (26/6/14)
But you took the damages for it - why?
A what? Show some published evidence. You do, do you? Interesting.

You See, It Is Confirmed, 'Liberty' Have Totally Forgotten What Liberty Means

Liberty? ... don't make us laugh


(Embedded Tweets - click date)


11 April 2014 Last updated at 12:05

Paedophile's [sic] images of abuse victim cannot be deleted, police say

The paedophile's [sic] laptop contains images of the girl he abused

Dorset Police officers have said it would be "unlawful" to delete photos of an abuse victim from a paedophile's [sic] laptop.

The man, a family member, was jailed in 2013 for nine years after admitting a string of sex offences, including assaulting a child under the age of 13.

He has now formally requested a laptop and a mobile telephone are handed back.

Liberty, which represents the victim's family, said photos of the girl in swimwear and leotards were on the PC.

"It would be unlawful for police officers to alter the computer and phone's memories by removing the disputed photographs before returning them”

Dorset Police

Dorset Police said they could not delete the family pictures as they were not legally classified as indecent or prohibited.

As a result, the sex offender, who is in his 50s but cannot be named to protect the identity of his victim, will have access to photos of the girl and her family when he is eventually released from jail.

The victim's mother said the family had been "traumatised" by the abuse.

"I am appalled that the man who abused my child can ask the police to hand over our family photos for him to keep for the rest of his life.

"My daughters struggle every day with the devastating consequences of his abuse and this will only make them feel more humiliated and degraded.

"Why should we continue to be traumatised further?"

'Violation of dignity' [sic]

Liberty argued that the return of the computer and mobile would breach articles three and eight of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect against inhuman treatment and invasion of privacy, respectively.

In a letter to Dorset Police, Liberty said the prospect of having the photos returned to the abuser was "causing the girls a significant amount of distress" and would be "an enormous violation of their dignity and personal integrity".

The abuse has caused the victim to suffer "enormous psychological harm" and she eats very little, self-harms frequently and is at risk of suicide, Liberty said.

Rosie Brighouse, legal officer at the organisation, said: "We urge the police to protect these victims' dignity.

"It's surely common sense that these vulnerable girls aren't degraded further?"

'Fundamental error'

In a reply, Dorset Police said "present options" were limited as the legislation used to seize the phone and computer required officers to return the property.

The force added: "Furthermore it would be unlawful for police officers to alter the computer and phone's memories by removing the disputed photographs before returning them."

The county's Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC), Martin Underhill, said it was not the fault of the police and has set up an e-petition to lobby to change the "fundamental error" in the law.[ah, a loophole, again]

He said: "How can we protect victims of sexual abuse if current legislation allows perpetrators to keep images of them?

"Think of the trauma this causes to the victims. And think of the control and power this gives the abuser.""

Anger over paedophile [sic] laptop move

Outrage as paedo [sic] to be given back laptop containing images of girl he abused

Outrage as paedophile [sic] set to have photos of stepdaughter victim returned to him - and there's nothing the law can do 

Police set to return child images to paedophile [sic]

Sex offenders 'must not be allowed to be given sick images back', says Dorset police chief Martyn Underhill

Attorney General to investigate case of paedophile [sic] who wants pictures of victim returned


Martyn Underhill @Tosh599

PCCDorset Verified account @PCCDorset 


Stop sex offenders retaining photo's of their victims

11/04/2015 09:35

"Responsible department: Ministry of Justice

I have come across a case which highlights how victims of sexual abuse are being let down. This case involves a man convicted for sexual abuse. When he was arrested, his laptop was seized by the Police. Now the man is convicted, the case is over, the man is asking for his laptop back.

The laptop contains images of his victims which were not deemed indecent. 

The law states that the police have to return the equipment in its original condition.

This is a Dorset case. Question? Should an abuser, be allowed to retain images of his victims? Think of the trauma this causes to the victims? And think of the control and power this gives the abuser? This is not the fault of the police. The legislation is wrong. It is double jeopardy for victim’s photos to be viewed by their abuser – it opens old wounds. Victims need better protection, Government should legislate to stop all victim images being retained by sex offenders." 

 (Embedded Tweets - click date)


A father cannot own legal photos of his child?

Little wonder, that they will not reply to our communications.

We may correct, all the glaring falsehoods and lies, later.


(Embedded Tweets - click date)

A Small, Yet Dangerous, Collective - When Survivors Attack - 5

(Embedded Tweets - click date)



Addendum (14/4/14)

Twitter ... 

Ian Mcfadyen @IanMcFadyen1966 

@IanMcFadyen1966 is a dangerous cyber-vigilante - do not respond to him, or those in his feeds (or potential socks) - TY

@IanMcFadyen1966 is a dangerous cyber-vigilante - do not respond to him, or those in his feeds (or potential socks) - Police aware

@IanMcFadyen1966 is a dangerous cyber-vigilante - please visit our blog or email for evidence - TY

"Thief , liar, cheat , drug addict, beggar,violent man!" quote of himself, from Ian McFadyen

"I have lied,begged,manipulated,deceived & been dishonourable.I was an addict on the streets!" quote of himself, from Ian McFadyen

... and as Ian would suggest, a leopard can never change it spots, right?

Ian depends on his past victimhood for sympathy and credibility - but, that smokescreen is being cleared.

Good always outs, in time, let the police do their work, for now.

We expect more false-flagging suspensions, it is a price worth paying, to save lives and expose the truth.

... and, of course, there was.


In fact, Mr McFadyen is superbly-manipulative, likely-honed, by decades of 'management' and deception, in his working and private life.
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

That was when he would not, or could not, be challenged.

He still plays the victim card, to his advantage, when it suits, slipping back into being a faux survivor, without concern; happy to trigger, at will, for effect and social profit. Exploiting the emotions and energies, of apparent survivors, so as to attempt to achieve his goal. 

We find, how Mr McFadyen defines himself, today, very telling ...

Former Caldicott headteacher jailed for years of abuse

As the record shows, we tried so hard, so as to avoid this conflict, but, Mr McFadyen has decided otherwise. 

His Passive-Aggressive behaviour and Static Risk, make him a dangerous man, hence, the requirement for a legal response. 
(Embedded Tweet - click date)


More to follow.

Thursday, 10 April 2014

Ladies And Gentlemen - Please Meet, Mr Mic Wright (Part 3)


As Mr Wright's (and other) publications, continue to cause harassment, anxiety and distress, the endangering of lives and the wasting of much police time, it appears clarification and correction are now essential.

Even though ignorance is no defence, to many offences, we are reasonable people.

It should be made clear, Dr Oldfield has served his time (and more) and need not justify his position to anyone; none of us are defined by our past. However, it is obvious, that many people, simply, do not understand what the legal and societal issues are, in such cases.

Of course, many are, simply, dangerous, greedy and malicious - or a combination, thereof.


"Mic Wright"

Mic Wright @brokenbottleboy

"Mic Wright is a journalist specialising in technology, music and popular culture. He lives in Dublin."

Debatable, and certainly not anymore, for the Telegraph, it appears.

"The sex offender so brazen he's sharing a link to my blog post about him"

 See below.

"By Mic Wright Society Last updated: August 9th, 2013"


"Nigel Leigh Oldfield is a convicted sex offender. "

Well, it really is not that simple, it all depends on what you mean by 'sex offender'. This has been clarified, here.

"He is the worst kind."

There are graduations - really? - Excellent.

An unrepentant one. He is the man behind The OSC (Online Sex-Offender Community) the Twitter account and blog I wrote about earlier this week. He served 12 months in jail for downloading over 11,000 indecent images of children including babies in 2002. Though there are nests of pro-abuse activists online, Oldfield is isolated. He runs a “community” in name only. I am told by those who have studied this sick subculture that even some paedophiles consider him an embarrassment.

The pseudo-intellectual Oldfield is a former chemistry teacher. He styles himself as “Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield” and has popped up several times on national radio and television. His most notable appearance was on Newsnight in 2007 pompously defending his repellent views. Over and over again he made excuses for viewing images of children being abused. He is the ugly agony uncle of the online child sexual abuse community giving tips on avoiding prosecution and defending the indefensible.

After I wrote about Oldfield and his activity on Twitter, he posted information about me on his latest blog. It is not the first he has run on the topic of defending child sex abuse. Previous sites have been shut down by ISPs. However, he currently has at least three up and running. A quick search also throws up numerous forum posts in which Oldfield defends child sexual exploitation. Here’s one example from a Google Group where he expresses disbelief that a convicted sex offender should be stopped from photographing children in the street. On YouTube, he has posted videos where he complains about the persecution of sex offenders, “isolated and poverty-stricken for no good reason”.

Now, on his OSC blog, where he obsessively documents media reports on child sexual abuse, he has posted: my picture, links to my Twitter account, my personal blog, my online CV and screen grabs of my original article shared on Facebook. The post assures me that I am “small fry” but that I can expect a “full and frank response – when we have finished with bigger and more essential issues”. Given his past record, I won’t pause to imagine what those could be. He’s certainly had time to boast about his renewed notoriety on yet another Google Group.

I don’t believe in naming and shaming sex offenders or in vigilante actions. I don't want these individuals pushed underground and out of sight. However, Oldfield names and shames himself. Across the internet, he is active in promoting abuse and attempting to dismiss the harm it causes. I have seen the flabby banal face of evil in a YouTube video. This is who the Prime Minister is trying to combat with his current proposals, the kind of offender so thoroughly certain that it is he who has been wronged. Oldfield thinks he is the one sane man in society. He luxuriates in being written about. Ultimately he is “small fry” himself but deeply unpleasant all the same. I know Nigel intends me to feel threatened but I’m not in his usual demographic.

Tags: Nigel Leigh Oldfield, paedophilia"


"A 13-year-old sexual predator? No. I encountered the real deal last night"

"By Mic Wright Society Last updated: August 7th, 2013"

NW is 41 years old. He took a 13-year-old girl home, allowed her to strip and then engaged in what we must euphemistically refer to as a “sex act” with her. For this and other offences including the possession of eight images of child sexual abuse and eleven sexual images involving horses and dogs, he received an eight-month suspended sentence. But it’s not the lenience of the punishment that has pushed the case into the headlines. It's the comments of the prosecutor and judge.

The Crown Prosecution Service has disavowed the words used by prosecutor Robert Colover at Snaresbrook crown court as “inappropriate”. That’s far too mild, almost offensively so. Colover told the court: “The girl is predatory in all her actions and she is sexually experienced.” His Honour Judge Nigel Peters said in his judgment: “On these facts, the girl was predatory and was egging you on. That is no defence when dealing with children but I am prepared to impose a suspension.” This should go without saying, but in an encounter between an adult man and a girl of 13, the child is not the predator. Regardless of whether she has been sexualised, she is a victim.

I hadn't thought a great deal about this case before I came into contact with a real predator last night. Popping up in the middle of a conversation on Twitter about my bullying piece, someone called “the OSC” revealed himself (or, less likely, herself) to be a fervent defender of paedophiles. Not only does this individual have a Twitter account dedicated to obsessively pushing distorted views about children, he also has a blog. One which has been relentlessly updated since April 2012. I've since discovered that OSC stands for "Online Sex-Offender Community".

I’m flagging up this particular example not because it is rare or unusual but because there is a whole network of these sites and accounts across the web. Those who identify themselves as part of the Online Sex-Offender Community are brazen. Their behaviour justifies the scepticism I and many others have shown towards David Cameron’s internet filtering proposals.

One of the measures put forward the Prime Minister and his dotty surrogate on the issue, Claire Perry, is a pop-up to tell those who seek child abuse images that they risk their jobs, their lives and their families by doing so. The existence of sick individuals such as the OSC, operating in the open on social networks, puts paid to the notion that these people can be shamed. Among the OSC’s messages about the Wilson case there are several references to the girl as a “Lolita”.

The existence of these dangerous individuals is the reason we need to spend more money on traditional policing and investigations. It’s also why charities such as The Lucy Faithful Foundation, which works to prevent abuse and deal with offenders and potential offenders, are so important. The brashness of the OSC is yet more evidence that desperately clutching at technical solutions is not the way to deal with this evil.

Tags: abuse, Claire Perry, David Cameron, internet filters, pedophiles, Twitter"

(Embedded Tweet - click date)


More to follow; an ongoing project, including the other, oft-quoted, scurrilous 'sources'.

What A Fool Believes ...

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

This Is An Example, Of Those Who Make Our Laws - Little Wonder, We Are, Where We Are

Meral - forgotten what her role is -
seems more interested in her family home country, than in justice, here


Baroness Hussein-Ece @meralhece
(Embedded Tweets - click date)


Meral Hussein-Ece

"In November 2009, Ece was appointed as a Commissioner to the Equality and Human Rights Commission.",_Baroness_Hussein-Ece

"My early formative years have left me with a lifelong passion for, and commitment to, championing the cause of a more equal society."


The Death of the Life of Jimmy Savile; A Search for Reason

Justice For Jimmy Savile


Addendum (10/4/14)
(Embedded Tweets - click date)


Lord Jack is on the case ..
 (Embedded Tweets - click date)


Jack McConnell @LordMcConnell

... against bigotry ... super.


We Know, We Know - Why Do You Think So Many Ore Victims Were Found Guilty?

2:10pm UK, Monday 07 April 2014

Hackers Put Child Abuse Images On Computers

"Malware and viruses are being bundled with child abuse images to discourage people from having their computers repaired.

Cyber crime is becoming a bigger threat to companies

The number of pages containing child abuse images has risen in the UK

Hacking attacks which lodge child abuse images and malware on a computer user's hard drive are on the rise, it has been warned.

In its annual report, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) said there has been a significant increase in the number of legitimate websites being compromised.

First, the hackers infiltrate a site before planting the child abuse images and malware in folders on a hidden URL.

The folders are then inadvertently accessed by unsuspecting web surfers through a redirect link on a legitimate adult site.

When the link is clicked, the files are downloaded to the user’s computer."

Monday 7 April 2014

Pictures of child sex abuse are hidden in UK sites


The Appalling Vista

The Appalling Vista – the fight back against Operation Ore

Monday, 7 April 2014

We Tried Ian, Oh How We Tried, But, You Made The Decision

(Embedded Tweets - Click Date)


Ian McFadyen

Ian Mcfadyen @IanMcFadyen1966


Last updated at 12:01AM, December 19 2013

A life ruined by Caldicott paedophile [sic] 

10:49AM GMT 13 Feb 2014

Nick Clegg hails courage of former classmate who blew whistle on child abuse teacher

Thursday 13th February 2014

Clegg's Old School Friend Gives Heartbreaking Account Of Abuse

Published: 13 February 2014; Updated: 14:07, 13 February 2014

Nick Clegg confronted by former class mate who revealed sex abuse at school

13 February 2014 Last updated at 12:29

Nick Clegg pays tribute to classmate revealing abuse

Published: 22:05, 20 December 2013 | Updated: 15:27, 30 December 2013

Cover-up that let the head of Nick Clegg's prep school get away with abusing boys for decades

Last updated at 12:01AM, December 20 2013

The smiles that hid long reign of sex attacks by Caldicott teachers

20th March 2014

From public schoolboy to begging on the streets

Last Updated: Monday, 19 June 2006, 05:39 GMT 06:39 UK

'My mother failed to recognise me'


Published on the 13 Jul, 2014

Breaking the silence over child abuse

“I thought I would be punching the air, but I felt empty,” says McFadyen, who now lives in the Scottish Borders. “It gives me no joy watching old men going to prison, although I realise they have to pay for what they’ve done."

Saturday 19 July 2014

The damage boarding schools do 

"Truth and reconciliation. That’s what we all deserve.”"

Published: 21:56, 6 August 2014 | Updated: 10:08, 7 August 2014

Husband and wife who NEVER have sex - but say their marriage couldn't be more loving: A story that'll change the way you think about love

">Ian and Paula McFadyen have only had sex a couple of times during their 10 year marriage >Paula, 49, takes anti-depressants to deal with their lack of physical intimacy
>Ian, 47, was repeatedly raped [incorrect] as a schoolboy, leaving him emotionally and mentally scarred [medical evidence?]"
(Embedded Tweet - click date)


Published on Feb 6, 2014

Former Caldicott headteacher jailed for years of abuse

Published on Feb 4, 2014

Caldicott abuse victim: I haven't got justice


(Embedded Tweet - Click Date)  

Posted: 06/04/2014 16:24

It's Time to Count the Costs of Child Sexual Abuse


Ian then continues to harass a named person and regurgitate his sorry message, to all those we follow ... 
 (Embedded Tweets - Click Date


More to follow., we expect. 

Mr McFadyen is, clearly, a deluded, dangerous and obsessive man.

(Embedded Tweets - Click Date)


Addendum (8/4/14)

So it continues ...
 (Embedded Tweets - Click Date)

 (Embedded Tweets - Click Date

 (Embedded Tweets - Click Date

 (Embedded Tweets - Click Date

Cycle of child sexual abuse: links between being a victim and becoming a perpetrator 


The data support the notion of a victim-to-victimiser cycle in a minority of male perpetrators but not among the female victims studied. Sexual abuse by a female in childhood may be a risk factor for a cycle of abuse in males. "

Addressing the victim to offender cycle

"In all cases, the findings are about ‘higher risk,’ not ‘cause and effect’"

The Cycle of Sexual Abuse

"Why Sexually Abused Children Grow Up to Have Abusive Relationships in Adulthood."
 (Embedded Tweets - Click Date)


So it continues ...
 (Embedded Tweets - Click Date)

 (Embedded Tweet - Click Date)


So it continues ...

 (Embedded Tweets - Click Date)

(Embedded Tweet - Click Date)

Katie Razzall @katierazz Reporter on Channel 4 News


Addendum (9/4/14)

So it continues ...

All contained tweets are archived by copying, screenshot and timestamp, for later use, if needs be. 


For legal reasons, this thread is, presently, locked.