Not too hot :(
>>> No Nexus: No Culpability: No Victim: No Harm <<<
>>> No Nexus: No Culpability: No Victim: No Harm <<<
(A) The, still, unproven proposition, which we will accept, for now,
Awareness (A1) = Harm 1 (H1),
Awareness (A1) + Awareness (A2) = Harm 2 (H2),
let A2 = 0, particularly, where Awareness is impossible,
Additional Harm (Hadd) = H2 - H1 = 0,
hence, in the absence of awareness, no harm occurs.*
Viewer 1 (V1) = Harm 1 (H1) = Additional Harm (Hadd) = 0, as shown above,
Viewer 1 (V1) + Viewer 2 (V2) = Harm 2 (H2),
when no nexus is present, H2 = 0,
hence, there is no harm, from viewing material provided by another viewer, when no nexus to the alleged act, is present.*
*except those real harms, created by insane laws.
Sexual Offences Guideline Consultation
Section six: Indecent images of children
Response to “A Reluctant Rebellion”
Alexandra Gelber, Assistant Deputy Chief, Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Criminal Division, United States Department of Justice, July 1, 2009.
A Reluctant Rebellion
Mark Hansen, Jun 02, 2009
A Response to Alexandra Gelber’s, “Response to “A Reluctant Rebellion,””
Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield, Researcher and Ex-offender in This Field.
 2 All ER 1065,  2 Cr App Rep (S) 49, 
EWCA Crim 3079,  2 Cr App R (S) 49
The Unjust, Irrational, and Unconstitutional Consequences of Pedophilia Panic
"The fear and disgust triggered by this subject help explain why laws dealing with sex offenses involving minors frequently lead to bizarre results."
3rd April 2017
Working with sex offenders and paedophiles
NO nexus = NO culpability = NO harm = NO victim
"The typical client is dealing with intense shame regarding their behaviour, the shattering impact of police officers arriving at the door early in the morning with a search warrant, the distress of their family and friends and the threat of losing their job. So initially I work with these issues and I describe the experiences of other clients, whilst of course maintaining strict confidentiality. This helps them understand that they are not unique. I also look at the triggers for their offending behaviour, as this awareness helps them change their behaviour to avoid being triggered.
Viewing indecent child images is not a victimless crime – others have directly abused children in order to feed the offender’s appetite.
Unless the offender is able to acknowledge this harm then therapy will not succeed. I am aware that the quality of my work will influence whether the offender recovers or continues to harm others, including children. This pressure is particularly intense when dealing with offenders who have harmed children directly."
"Michael Stock is a counsellor and psychosexual therapist from StopSO: The Specialist Treatment Organisation for the Prevention of Sexual Offending works to prevent sexual offending through therapy. StopSO is an agency that connects clients asking for help with a specially trained, experienced psychotherapist (or counsellor) who is geographically close. This service is available to anyone who feels at risk of committing a sexual offence, as well as those who have already committed a sexual offence. StopSO also offers therapy to the family members of sexual offenders. StopSO's aim is to reduce sexual offending by offering therapy to the (potential and actual) perpetrators in order to prevent harm, and thus protect society. www.stopso.org.uk; Telephone: 07533 996 906; firstname.lastname@example.org "
@StopSO_UK https://t.co/Nem3gU9JLO and here Michael is where it all goes bad ... pic.twitter.com/hTeJcTB9Wk— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK Almost all image acquisition, these days, has no nexus to the original act, depicted in an image. pic.twitter.com/gKEclMYpIA— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK ... no nexus = no culpability = no harm = no victim. To keep selling your lie, to your clients and all involved is a sham.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK ... you are compelling them to jump through a false hoop/lying, so as to be 'cured'. Who would not agree with you under those circumstances.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK It is bad enough, clueless judges doing so ... https://t.co/dfmglEiKIG but as a rationalist, you should be above such populist false dogma.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK Why Lawyers And Judges Are Rubbish At Mathematics - The Voodoo Harm Claims ... https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK We all want reintegration, rehabilitation and 'normality' returning to the lives of predominantly good men (forlorn hope in many cases) ...— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK .. but it cannot be built on obvious and evidenced lies. Carry on the good work but pls base it on reality, not dangerous false dogma. Peace— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@themainmantom @LutherKongGood1 Unless the offender is able to explicitly endorse this propaganda the brainwashing will not succeed.— xeno (@xenopoesis3) April 25, 2017
(Embedded Tweets - click date).Why Lawyers/Judges (Counsellors/Therapists @StopSO_UK) Are Rubbish At Maths - The Voodoo Harm Claims (Updated) . https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
No ifs, no buts. Viewing indecent images of u18s creates demand for an industry which harms children. See something suspicious? Report it! https://t.co/nm4N6lICpP— onlinePROTECT (@online_PROTECT) May 10, 2017
@online_PROTECT You are lying. You do not understand the mechanism of image accumulation ... https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh - https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) May 10, 2017
(Embedded Tweets - click date).@online_PROTECT p.s. show me the 'industry'.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) May 10, 2017
How can watching a recording of a crime be the same as committing that crime? https://t.co/vKlgtPcmFe— Dave Thompson (@fair1ife4a11) June 11, 2017
How does watching a video of a crime repeat it? That logic doesn't work for anything else.— Dave Thompson (@fair1ife4a11) June 10, 2017
Perps often claim they're watching kid porn for "research," so it must be off limits for everyone. As a former victim, I'm glad for that.— Michelle Stevens PhD (@DrMStevens) June 11, 2017
Try that "defense" as soon as FEDS find #ChildPorn on your Devices— ♿BuffBill Kevin 🐸🐼 (@Kevin_FTW) June 11, 2017
It is not a defence in law, statute/case law are only one small part of human experience ...— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) June 11, 2017
(Embedded Tweets - click date)What I state, is correct in reality, showing 'the law' to be faulty. Of course, there are such defences in law, as well i.e. mens rea.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) June 11, 2017
When Judges Talk Rubbish - Voodoo Obiter Dicta
More to follow.